Comments

  • Seattle Sommelier

    Dave, Nice recap…but I'm curious about your preference for non-oaked Chardonnay and your bias towards oak / over-oaked, Land-O-Lakes wines. As a measure/standard of excellence, who's world-class unoaked chardonnay would one use as a guide for evaluation? I would argue that a World-Class / Classic Chardonnay has a fair to medium plus amount of oak…something of which you don't care for – so why were you judging Chardonnay?

  • wineqpr

    Thanks “Seattle Sommelier”, a GREAT question. My comment with regard to “I prefer stainless steel Chardonnays to their counterpoint—the oaky over-the-top gruesomely dolloped “Land-O-Lakes” styled specimens,” is just that! If you’re going to go overboard in you production/craftsmanship of Chardonnay, let the malolactic fermentation get away from you, and over oak the wine, then I’d prefer a stainless steel version.

    As I mentioned in the next sentence, “However I find that I often enjoy a well-balanced combination of the two, the on-the-fence versions, and the double-bubble bottlings.”

    The reason that I was judging Chardonnay is that I’m aware of what makes for balance. As you can see, I posted my favorites before the official results were released and the other judges enjoyed the very same wines.

  • http://www.facebook.com/douglashaugen Doug Haugen

    Seattle Sommelier, is the measure of a good wine determined by how closely it resembles a particular winery's “classic” wine? Should wineries be attempting to replicate a wine that was scored highly by a particular critic, or should balance and structure be a goal, along with a winemaker's particular stylistic flourish?

  • Dave Bender

    Thanks “Seattle Sommelier”, a GREAT question. My comment with regard to “I prefer stainless steel Chardonnays to their counterpoint—the oaky over-the-top gruesomely dolloped “Land-O-Lakes” styled specimens,” is just that. If you’re going to go overboard in you production/craftsmanship of Chardonnay, let the malolactic fermentation get away from you, and over oak the wine, then I’d prefer a stainless steel version.

    As I mentioned in the next sentence, “However, I find that I often enjoy a well-balanced combination of the two, the on-the-fence versions, and the double-bubble bottlings.”

    The reason that I was judging Chardonnay is that I’m aware of what makes for balance. As you can see, I posted my favorites before the official results were released and the other judges enjoyed the very same wines.

  • wineqpr

    Thanks “Seattle Sommelier”, a GREAT question. My comment with regard to “I prefer stainless steel Chardonnays to their counterpoint—the oaky over-the-top gruesomely dolloped “Land-O-Lakes” styled specimens,” is just that! If you’re going to go overboard in you production/craftsmanship of Chardonnay, let the malolactic fermentation get away from you, and over oak the wine, then I’d prefer a stainless steel version.

    As I mentioned in the next sentence, “However I find that I often enjoy a well-balanced combination of the two, the on-the-fence versions, and the double-bubble bottlings.”

    The reason that I was judging Chardonnay is that I’m aware of what makes for balance. As you can see, I posted my favorites before the official results were released and the other judges enjoyed the very same wines.

  • http://www.facebook.com/douglashaugen Doug Haugen

    Seattle Sommelier, is the measure of a good wine determined by how closely it resembles a particular winery's “classic” wine? Should wineries be attempting to replicate a wine that was scored highly by a particular critic, or should balance and structure be a goal, along with a winemaker's particular stylistic flourish?